K. S. HEGDE, P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, A. N. GROVER, S. M. SIKRI, G. K. MITTER
Indian Mica Micanite Industries – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Judgment
HEGDE, J.: - In this appeal by certificate the vires of Rule 111 of the Rules framed under Section 90 of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 is in issue. The appellant, Indian Mica and Micanite Industries contends that the said Rule is ultra vires the Constitution. The High Court of Patna rejected that contention.
2. In the High Court various contentions came up for consideration. The High Court has come to the conclusion that the levy made under the impugned rule is a fee. That finding was not challenged before us by any of the parties. Therefore all that we have to see is whether the fee levied is within the permissible limit. In other words whether there is sufficient quid pro quo for the levy in question.
3. The appellant is a consumer of denatured spirit. It purchases denatured spirit from the wholesalers or the manufacturers for the purpose of manufacturing micanite. The Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 (Bihar and Orissa Act 2 of 1915) came into force on January 19, 1916. In pursuance of the provisions of that Act the impugned Rule was framed by the Board of Revenue for levying licence fee. The fee for the licence to possess denatured spirit in 1919 was only Rs. 2/-
Mahant Sri Jagannath Ramanuj Das and Another v. The State of orissa and Another
Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. The State of Bombay and Others
The Hingir Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. and Others v. The State of orissa and Others
Corporation of Calcutta and Another v. Liberty Cinema
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Chief Commissioner, Delhi and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.