SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 240

A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE
Jaipur Hosiery Mills Private LTD. , Jaipur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, Bishambar Lal Khanna, H.K.PURI, H.R.GOKHALE, K.B.MEHTA

Judgment

GROVER J.:- These eight appeals by certificate arise out of a common judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dismissing the petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by the appellants.

2. The appellants carry on the business inter alia, of manufacture and sale of vests and underwears (Baniyans and Chaddies) out of knitted fabric. On January 31, 1958 a notification was issued by the State Government under Section 4 (2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1950. hereinafter called the "Act, exempting from tax the sale of any garment whether prepared within or imported from outisde Rajasthan the value of which did not exceed Rs.4 in single piece. In spite of the aforesaid notification the authorities did not exempt from payment of sales tax the sale of vests and underwears the value of which did not exceed Rs.4 in single piece. The notification was interpreted to mean that the goods manufactured by the appellants were not garments within its meaning. M/s. Pareek Hosiery Products Jaipur took the matter to the High Court by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution which was allowed and it was held that the vests and underwears were covered by the said noti





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top