SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.C. SHAH, K.S. HEGDE AND A.N. GROVER, JJ.
State of Assam, Appellant
Versus
Assam Tea Co. Ltd., Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 435 of 1970, D/-2l-8-1970.
Assam Municipal Act, 1923 - Assam Municipal Act, 1923 - Section 4 (1) (b) & (c) and 5 (1) & (2) (b) and 336 (3) - Assam Municipal Act 15 of 1957 - Section 4 (1) (b) - Assam General Clauses Act, 1915 - Section 26 - Company – Tea gardens - Municipal fund - Challenged - Assam Tea Company Ltd., owns tea gardens in village of Nazira in State of Assam - By a notification dated Government of Bengal (which then had territorial jurisdiction over territory now within State of Assam) constituted a Town Committee at Nezira adjacent to tea garden of Company - In Legislature enacted Assam Municipal Act 1 of 1923 - Section 328 of Act provided for constitution of notified areas - By subsection (1) of Section 328 Provincial Government was authorised by notification, to signify its intention to declare that with respect to some or all of matters upon which a Municipal fund may be expended, improved arrangements are required within a specified area - Any inhabitant of any part of a local area defined in a notification published under Section 4, was entitled by virtue of Section 5 to raise objections to proposed action – Held, It is unnecessary to consider whether, as suggested by counsel for State of Assam, by virtue of Section 336 (3) once a notification under Sec. 4 of the Act of 1923 was issued, for all purposes a Town Committee became a municipality and on that account notification continued to remain in operation - In our judgment, under provisions of Assam General Clauses Act, 1915, Section 26 saves notification in question - There is no express provision in Act 15 of 1957 which supersedes notification issued in 1951 under Act of 1923, nor is continuance of notification inconsistent with any provision in new Act - Notification must be deemed to have remained in force and State Government was competent in exercise of the power conferred upon it by Section 4 of Act 15 of 1957 to include within area of Town Committee any local area contiguous to same - Court are here dealing only with validity of notification issued by State Government and not with validity of demand for license fee or other taxes levied by notified Town Committee - Nothing in this judgment will affect right of company to challenge validity of demand for such taxes in appropriate proceedings - Appeal allowed.
Judgment
SHAH, J.:- The Assam Tea Company Ltd., owns tea gardens in the village of Nazira in the State of Assam. By a notification dated June 16, 1909, the Government of Bengal (which then had territorial jurisdiction over the territory now within the State of Assam) constituted a Town Committee at Nezira adjacent to the tea garden of the Company. In 1923 the Legislature enacted the Assam Municipal Act 1 of 1923. Section 328 of the Act provided for the constitution of notified areas. By subsection (1) of Section 328 the Provincial Government was authorised by notification, to signify its intention to declare that with respect to some or all of the matters upon which a Municipal fund may be expended, improved arrangements are required within a specified area. After issuing such a notification the Government was competent, after six weeks from the date of publication, and after considering the objections, if any, to declare, by notification, the specified area or any portion thereof to be a notified area Section 4 of the Act authorised the Provincial Government by notification, inter alia to signify its intention to include within a Municipality any local area in the vicinity of the same or exclude from a Municipality any local area comprised therein. Any inhabitant of any part of a local area defined in a notification published under Section 4, was entitled by virtue of Section 5 to raise objections to the proposed action. The Government would after considering the objections, inter alia, include the local area or any part thereof within the Municipality or exclude it therefrom. The provisions of Sections 4 and 5 were not of their own force applicable to a notified area constituted under Section 328 but by virtue of Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 330 it was competent to the Provincial Government to extend to any notified area the provisions of any section of the Act. By sub-section (3) of Section 330 it was provided:
"For the purposes of any section of this Act which may be extended to a notified area, the town committee constituted for such area, under Section 329, shall be deemed to be a Municipal Board under this Act and the area to be a municipality." Notifications were issued from time to time applying certain provisions of the Assam Municipal Act,1923. In 1951 the Government of the State of Assam issued a notification applying Ss. 4 (1) (b) & (c) and 5 (1) & (2) (b) of the Assam Municipal Act, 1923 to the notified area committee including the Nazira Town Committee. But no notification under Section 328 of the Assam Municipal Act, 1923 extending the boundaries of the Nazira Town Committee area was issued. In 1957 the Assam Municipal Act, 1923 was repealed and was replaced by the Assam Municipal Act 15 of 1957. On January 6, 1964 a notification was issued under Section 4 (1) (b) of Act 15 of 1957 to revise the boundaries of the notified area at Nazira, and thereby included a part of the tea estate belonging to the Assam Tea Co. Ltd. in the Nazira Town Committee area. Objections submitted by the Assam Tea Company Ltd. were considered and overruled and the Government of Assam by notification dated September 30, 1964, incorporated within the Nazira Town Committee area a part of the area of the tea garden belonging to the Company.
2. The Company then filed a petition in the High Court of Assam challenging the validity of the notification. The High Court was of the view that the any had provided all amenities and facilities which a municipality may provide, and since it did not appear that any "improved arrangements" could be provided by the Town Committee the notification issued by the Government was "colourable legislation" and was liable to be struck down in so far as it related to the area of the tea estate belonging to the Company. We have considered in Appeal No. 2052 of 1969 (Reported in AIR 1970 SC 2072), State of Assam v. The Amalgamted Tea Estates Co. Ltd., the correctness of this decision and we have rejected i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.