SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 306

A.N.GROVER, J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE
Raj Kumar Singh Hukam Chandji – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, M. P. – Respondent


Judgment

HEGDE, J: The question of law arising for decision in these appeals by certificate under S. 66A (2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (to be hereinafter referred to as the Act) is:

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the managing director s remuneration received by Sri Rajkumar Singh was assessable in his individual hands and not in the hands of the assessee Hindu Undivided Family?"

2. This question was referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench A to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (of M. P.?) on an application made under S. 66 (1) of the Act by the Commissioner of Income-tax Madhya Pradesh. The High Court has answered that question in favour of the Revenue. As against that decision this appeal has been brought.

3. The assessee in this case is a Hindu Undivided Family and the concerned assessment year is 1954-55, the relevant accounting period being the year ending Diwali 1953 i.e. November 6, 1953. Previously a Hindu Undivided Family was carrying on business under the name and style of Sarupchand Hukamchand. That family was carrying on several businesses one of which was the management certain mills. That family disrupted on




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top