SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 230

I.D.DUA, J.M.SHELAT, V.BHARGAVA
Regional Provident Fund Inspector, Guntur – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Hariharan – Respondent


Advocates:
L.M.SINGHVI, S.P.NAIR

Judgment

DUA, J.: - The appellant in this appeal by certificate granted by the Andhra Pradesh High Court on February 25, 1965 under Article 133 (1) (b) of the Constitution is the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh A large number of writ petitions by various parties were filed in the High Court praying for writs in the nature of mandamus directing the appellant to forbear from enforcing or taking other proceedings under the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds Act, 1952 (hereinafter called the Act) and the Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 With the exception of perhaps one writ petition, all the rest, including W. P. 907 of 1963 presented by T. S. Hariharan, Proprietor, New Cochin Cafe, Ongole, respondent in this Court were dismissed. Certificates under Article 133 (1) (b) of the Constitution were secured by the appellant in almost all the cases but the present is the only appeal which now survives, all the rest having been dismissed for non prosecution.

2. The writ petition of the respondent was dismissed which means that the final order made by the High Court was in favour of the appellant. The only grievance raised by the appellant s learned counsel in this Cour






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top