SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 222

A.N.RAY, C.A.VAIDIALINGAM
Saifuddin Sood – Appellant
Versus
State Of J & K – Respondent


Judgment

RAY, J.:- The petitioners in these three writ petitions asked for orders in the nature of habeas corpus.

2. The petitioner Saifuddin alleges that he was arrested by the police on 4 October, 1970 without any order of arrest or detention. He also alleges that he was not given any cause of arrest or detention at the time of his arrest or therefore. He therefore, challenges that his arrest under the Jammu & Kashmir Preventive Detention Act, 1964 (hereinafier referred to as the Act) is illegal.

3. The answer is filed by A. R. Khajuria, Deputy Secretary to the Government of Jammu & Kashmir. It is stated there that the petitioner was detained by the orders of the Secretary to the Government dated 20 June, 1969. He was detained under Section 3 (1) (a) (i) read with Section 5 of the Act. The orders specifically stated that the Government was satisfied that with a view to prevent the petitioner from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State, it was necessary to detain him. The order was served on the petitioner on 20 June, 1969 by reading over the same and explaining to him in Urdu language. The Government on 28 June, 1969 passed an order pursuant to Section 8 read













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top