SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(SC) 353

I.D.DUA, S.M.SIKRI
R. J. Singh Ahulluwalia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Delhi – Respondent


Judgment

DUA, J.: - The sole point requiring determination by this Court in this appeal by special leave is whether the appellant s prosecution was sanctioned by the competent authority. In the High Court also this was the only question canvassed on behalf of the appellant. The facts necessary for appreciating the point raised briefly stated are these:

The Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Department of Defence Supplies issued a circular in which it was emphasised that the applications from the entrepreneurs for the additional quota of electronic equipment must be submitted at the latest by December 31, 1966. Shri Anand Singh Bawa, Director of the Northen India Plywood (P) Ltd., Marshall House, Hanuman Road, New Delhi went to the Co-ordination Department of DGTD, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi for the purpose of submitting two applications; one in his own name and the other in the name of his father. They were desirous of setting up projects for the manufacture of electronic and radio components. He reached that office on December 31, 1966 after 4 p. m. and presented his applications to the appellant who was working as Assistant in Co-ordination III of the DG





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top