SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 218

A.N.GROVER, K.S.HEGDE
Veeramachineni Gangadhara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Andhra Bank LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SUBBA RAO, B.V.SUBRAHMANYAM, K.R.CHAUDHARY

Judgment

HEGDE, J.: The 4th defendant in Original Suit No. 200 of 1954 in the court of Subordinate Judge, Vijayawada is the appellant in this appeal by special leave. That was a suit instituted by the Andhra Bank Ltd., the contesting respondent in this appeal. The suit was to recover the loans advanced to the Godavari Sugars, Refiners Ltd., defendant No. 5 in the suit. The suit was decreed against all the defendants and that decree was affirmed by the High Court in appeal. The decree against the other defendants has become final. The only question that arises for decision in this appeal is whether the decree against the appellant is sustainable. The High Court rested the decree against the appellant only on the basis of Ex. A-6 a letter given by defendants 1, 4 and another to the Masulipatam branch of the plaintiff bank while depositing Exhs. A-7 and A-8. In order to decide the correctness of the decree it is necessary to refer to the material facts as found by the trial court and the High Court and which are no more in dispute.

2. Defendants 1 to 3 were the partners of a company known as Aid Co. Ltd. (defendant No. 6). That company was the managing agents of defendant No. 5, the God









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top