SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 290

I.D.DUA, J.M.SHELAT, V.BHARGAVA
D. N. Chanchala: Usha P. Bhaskar: Ramasubramanyam Setty, V. : V. Soudamini: R. Jayashree – Appellant
Versus
State Of Mysore – Respondent


Judgment

SHELAT, J. (for himself and on behalf of Bhargava, J.):These five petitions have been filed by candidates who failed to be selected for admission in Government Medical Colleges in the State of Mysore and challenge the validity of the Selection Rules framed by the Government. Since they raise common questions, it is expedient to deal with them together and dispose them of by a common judgment. Writ Petition No.619 of 1970, we were told by counsel, is the most comprehensive of them all and therefore we shall deal with it first and as typical of the rest. As the rest of the petitions raise the same questions, it is not necessary to deal with each of them separately. Writ Petitions Nos. 621 and 622, however raise certain additional questions which will be dealt with to that extent separately.

2. Writ Petition No. 619 of 1970 :

The petitioner in this Writ Petition passed the Secondary School Leaving examination in March 1968 obtaining first class marks. In March 1969, she passed the Pre-University Course Examination held by the Bangalore University securing 67 per cent marks in optional subjects, namely Physics, Chemistry and Biology, and 71 per cent marks in the aggregate. Her fa























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top