SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 384

I.D.DUA, J.M.SHELAT, S.C.ROY
Raghubir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

DUA, J.: Raghubir Singh, appellant in this appeal by special leave, was one of the three persons jointly tried by the Sessions Judge, Etah (U. P.) and convicted for the offence of murder of one Brijendra Singh alleged to have been committed on November 15, 1968. He was sentenced to death under S. 302, I. P. C, whereas his two co-accused were sentenced to imprisonment for life under S. 302 read with S. 34, I. P. C. On appeals by the three convicts the High Court acquitted Tejpal and Kundan Singh who are first cousins. Conviction and sentence of the present appellant who is the real brother of Tejpal was confirmed and his appeal dismissed. In this Court the challenge is directed against his conviction and sentence and Shri Nuruddin Ahmed appellant s learned counsel has addressed elaborate arguments in support at his challenge.

2. According to the prosecution story about 8 or 9 years before the alleged murder in question a burglary had taken place at the appellant s house and he had suspected Brijendra Pal Singh, deceased, as a culprit. Indeed, the appellant and his brother even resorted to some violence against the deceased. They were all residents of village Nagwai. After a l














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top