V.BHARGAVA, C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, J.M.SHELAT
Workers Employed In Hirakud Dam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent
Judgment
VAIDIALINGAM, J.: In this appeal by special leave the short question that arises for consideration is whether the State has got power to terminate the services of any member of the work-charged establishment under paragraph 11 of the Central Public Works Department Code (hereinafter to be referred as the Code) on giving one month s notice or a month s pay in lieu of notice.
2. The circumstances leading up to this appeal may be stated: A decision was taken to construct three dams right across the Mahanadi river, one at Hirakud, the second at Tikerpara and the third at Naraj as a multipurpose measure for preventing flood ravage in the Delta area, generating electricity and providing irrigation. The construction of Hirakud Dam was entrusted by the State of Orissa to the Central Waterways, Irrigation and Navigation Commission as their agent. For the purpose of the construction of Hirakud Dam, the C. W. I. N. Commission employed a large number of persons in the work-charged establishment on scales of remuneration at the rate paid by the Central Public Works Department and the service conditions of the persons so employed were governed by the provisions contained in the Code.
3. Af
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.