SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 514

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Khoday Eswarsa And Sons – Respondent


Judgement

VAIDIALINGAM, J.: - This appeal, by special leave, by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras, is against the Judgment and Order dated October 3, 1966 of the High Court of Mysore, rejecting the appellant s application filed under Section 66 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act) for directing the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras Bench to refer the question of law to the High Court.

2. The question of law, which the appellant wanted to be referred was:

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Appellate Tribunal was right in canceling the penalty of Rupees 35,000/- levied under Section 28 (1) (c) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922."

3. The respondent was a firm carrying on business of manufacturing silk, carbon papers, type-writer ribbons, liquor, spirituous drugs and chemicals etc. In respect of the assessment year 1955-56, the respondent has sent a return showing Rupees 51,214/- as taxable income. On looking into the accounts and other records, the Income-tax Officer made several additions to the amount shown in the return and ultimately fixed the total assessable income in the sum of Rupees 3,30,474/-. On appeal, the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top