SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY AND D.G. PALEKAR, JJ.
Dinabandhu Sahu, (In Cri. A. No. 39 of 1969) Santosh Kumar Sahu (In Cri. A. No. 40 of 1969), Appellant
Versus
The State of Orissa, (In both the Appeals), Respondent.
Criminal appeals Nos. 39 and 40 of 1969, D/- 17-11-1971.
Advocates appeared
Mr. A. S. R. Chari, Sr. Advocate, (M/s. Gobind Das and B. R. G. K. Achar, Advocates with him), for Appellants (In both the Appeals); M/s. Santosh Chatterjee and R. N. Sachthey, Advocates, for Respondent (In both the Appeals).
Contempt of High Court – Appeal Against Conviction - Whether justifiable or imaginary, in public mind and particularly in mind of litigants – Held, Learned Chief Justice also stated that there was nothing in writing either by way of an apology nor has regret been tendered in Court - Mr. Chari before Court pointed out, with some justification that if all that Court wanted was a written apology by Appellants there would have been no hesitation in their giving it as very cause for their apprehension had been removed, by explanation given by learned Chief Justice to remove any misunderstanding in public mind, which misunderstanding no longer existed after that explanation - By circumstance that a person who is a Respondents in a case where a judgment was reserved was given prominence and referred to in terms of praise or eulogy, that situation had changed after learned Chief Justice had given an explanation for reasons why Dr. Mahtab was given a seat among few selected persons at Buffet lunch and other matters incidental thereto - Apology tendered was not merely an apology but was something more than an apology because what was asked of Court out of its generosity was forgiveness; that this was sincerely meant is amply demonstrated by its being repeated again before Court – Court think that contempt if any has been certainly purged in manner in which apology was given and matter should have been set at rest there - It is no part of judicial function to be vindictive or allow any personal or other considerations to enter in discharge of its functions and since both learned Chief Justice and Misra, J. would have been prepared to accept that apology if it was given by Appellants themselves and in writing and since Mr. Chari said that Appellants would have been prepared to give such an apology in writing, if that was only things that was required and even now are ready and willing to do so Court feel that apology tendered on their behalf by their Senior Advocate can well be accepted and proceedings closed – Court set aside convictions and direct repayment of fine, if any, and close proceedings - Appeals allowed.
Judgment
P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J.: These two appeals are by Certificate against the Judgment of the Orissa High Court convicting the Appellants for contempt of the High Court and imposing a fine of Rs. 300/- on the Appellant Santosh Kumar Sahu and Rs. 100/- on the Appellant, Dinabandhu Sahu. It appears that Santosh Kumar Sahu who was a party to a Writ Petition No. 418 of 1967 on the file of High Court of Orissa filed a petition described as representation petition before the Chief Justice, Hon ble Shri S. Barman and his companion Justices, praying that their Lordships may consider if it amounts to a contempt of High Court and to take whatever steps the law of the land calls for. It appears that this petition was in respect of the Flag Hoisting function held in the High Court of Orissa on the Republic Day January 26, 1968 at about 11.30 a. m. at which the Governor of Orissa Dr. Khosla, Chief Minister Shri Singh Deo, Dr. Mahtab, an ex-Chief Minister of that State and many others including the President of the Advocates Association, the Advocate of the High Court, Dinabandhu Sahu who was ex-Minister and ex-Advocate General of Orissa and others were present. At that function the Chief Justice made a speech at which he commenced the address by particular reference to the Governor Dr. Khosla, Chief Minister Shri Singh Deo and Dr. Mahtab. In the speech he also made a pointed reference to the presence of Dr. H. K. Mahtab, the former Chief Minister of Orissa and said that he had played an effective part in having a separate High Court for Orissa. The Chief justice seems to have had a tower constructed in the High Court and had been instrumental in renovating and adding to the present High Court with lawns and a fountain, on the completion of which he took great pride. The Republic Day was made an occasion for the speech at which he traced the process through which the judiciary in the State developed culminating in the establishment and functioning of the High Court at Orissa. He said in this process of steady progress, "came the dream of the present Chief Justice-myself for a High Court with a Tower and a Fountain surrounded by green lawns and flower gardens as in a Temple with a Fountain of Justice ". It is unnecessary to further examine the speech made by him except to say that this gave rise to certain misunderstandings in the public mind particularly among the rival political factions in the Orissa State which as Mr. Chari, the learned Advocate for the Appellants, described were at that time looked up in a bitter political struggle. About this time a Commission of Enquiry had been appointed by the Government of Orissa which was headed by Mr. Justice H. R. Khanna of the Delhi High Court, as he then was, to enquire into the conduct of 15 persons who at one time or the other were Ministers between 1961-66. Three of these persons against whom the enquiry was being conducted had filed Writ Petitions in the High Court of Orissa-one was filed by Mr. Jagannatha Rao, former Minister in that State, being O. J. C. No. 396 of 1967, the second was by Mr. Biren Mitra, a former Chief Minister, being O. J. C. No. 408 of 1967 and the third by Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahu, a former Deputy Minister of Co-operative, Mining and Forest, being O. J. C. No. 418 of 1967. In this latter Writ Petition Mr. B. N. Singh Deo, Chief Minister and Dr. H. K. Mahtab, former Chief Minister and leader of the party which was supporting the coalition were two of the Respondents. From 9-1-68 to 17-1-68 the arguments in these petitions were heard and on the latter date the judgment was reserved. Two of the Judges who heard these petitions were also present at the Flag Hoisting function on the Republic Day at the time when the Chief Justice made the speech, which was the subject matter of the representation petition. It appears news of the speech of the learned Chief Justice on the Republic Day was given in the Kalinga an Orissa newspaper on the 28th January 1968. On 30-1-68
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.