SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 619

P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, D.G.PALEKAR
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ram Nath, Partner, Panna Lal Durga Prasad, Kanpur – Respondent


Advocates:
Nuruddin Ahmed, O.P.RANA, P.M.BHARDVAJ

Judgment

P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J.:- This Appeal is by Certificate against the order of the High Court of Allahabad quashing the charge framed by the Additional City Magistrate, Kanpur against the accused Respondent for offences under Sections 78 and 79 of the Trade and Mercandise Marks Act 43 of 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the ACt ). Respondent 1 to Respondent 4 are the partners of the firm M/s. Pannalal Durga Prasad of Nayaganj, Kanpur which is a firm of bullion merchants who have also been minting gold coins with a trade mark said to be similar to the one which is the registered trade mark of M/s. Habib Bank Ltd., Bombay and which was in force on the day when the alleged offence is said to have been committed.

2. On 24th October 1962 the Inspector of Trade Marks on behalf of the Director of Industries wrote a letter to the Additional City Magistrate I, Kanpur that M/s. Habib Bank Ltd., Bombay which is one of the foremost refiners of gold has been producing coins and pieces of gold of various shapes and sizes for sale commonly known as Habib Ka Sona and Sher Chap Pansa under a distinct trade mark, the most striking feature of which has always been a device of a lion holding










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top