SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 602

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.S. HEGDE AND A.N. GROVER, JJ.
S.M. Pandit and others, etc., Appellants
Versus
The State of Gujarat and others, etc., Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1109 of 1969, 519 and 520 of 1971, D/- 18-11-1971,
Advocates appeared
Mr. R.B. Datar, Advocate for Appellants (In all the Appeals); Mr. S. P. Nayar, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 (In C. A. No. 1109 of 1969) and for Respondents (In C. As. Nos. 519 and 520 of 1971), M/s. R. Gopalkrishnan and T. L. Garg, Advocates for Respondents Nos. 2 to 4, 7 and 20 (In C. A. No. 1109 of 1969).

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 309, 14 and 16 - Bombay Civil Services Classification and Recruitment Rules, 1959 - Rule 2, 3 and 1 - Cadre of Mamlatdars - Direct Recruitment to Posts - Promotion - Whether second proviso to rule relating to appointments to posts of Deputy Collectors in Bombay Civil Services Classification and Recruitment Rules as well as clause (3) of Rules framed under Art 309 of Constitution by Governor of Gujarat relating to appointments of Deputy Collectors and violative of Arts 14 and 16 of Constitution - Whether second proviso to Rule 1 of Bombay Civil Services Classification and Recruitment Rules and Rule 3 of Rules framed by Gujarat Government are violative of Arts. 14 and 16 of Constitution – Held, Learned Counsel for appellants did not contest proposition that if both directly recruited Mamlatdars as well as promotee Mamlatdars formed one class then impugned Rules will be violative of Arts. 14 and 16 on basis of decisions of this court referred to earlier - But he challenged conclusion of High Court that they formed one class or one cadre - According to him, directly recruited Mamlatdars and promotee Mamlatdars formed two different classes - High Court rejected that contention and in Court opinion rightly - Both directly recruited Mamlatdars as well as promotee Mamlatdars are designated as Mamlatdars - They have same pay scale - They discharge same functions - Posts held by them are interchangeable - There is nothing to show that two groups are kept apart – Court express no opinion on that question - Even if it is a valid condition, same does not show that directly recruited Mamlatdars formed a different class - There is no material to show that Government had prepared two separate seniority lists, one for directly recruited Mamlatdars and other for promotee Mamlatdars - Counsel for appellants sought to place some reliance on decision of this Court in State of Mysore v. P. Narasing Rao - That decision is clearly distinguishable - In that case, according to Rules framed by Government, non-matriculate tracers formed a separate cadre from those who had passed matriculation examination - Two cadres had different pay scales - Hence there was no discrimination between officers borne on same cadre - Appeals dismissed.

Judgment

HEGDE, J.: These are appeals by certificate. They raise one common question of law for consideration. That question is whether the second proviso to the rule relating to the appointments to the posts of Deputy Collectors in the Bombay Civil Services Classification and Recruitment Rules as well as clause (3) of the Rules framed under Art. 309 of the Constitution by the Governor of Gujarat relating to the appointments of Deputy Collectors and violative of Arts. 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The High Court of Gujarat has come to the conclusion that those provisions are violative of Articles 14 and 16. Aggrieved by that decision the appellants have brought these appeals.

2. Till the year 1950, the posts of Deputy Collectors were filled by Bombay Government partly by direct recruitment and partly by promotion from the cadre of Mamlatdars. On February 6, 1950, the Government decided to fill up those posts only by promotion from the cadre of Mamlatdars. At the same time it decided to introduce the system of direct recruitment to the posts of Mamlatdars who in the first instance were to be on probation for two years and if found suitable would be confirmed. It was further decided that 50 per cent of the posts of Deputy Collectors will be reserved for promotion of direct recruits in the cadre of Mamlatdars and the other 50 per cent for the promotee Mamlatdars. In 1959, the Bombay Government introduced a change in the mode of recruitment to the posts of Deputy Collectors. In pursuance of the resolution of the Government of Bombay, the Bombay Civil Service Classification and Recruitment Rules were changed and the amended Rules read as follows:

"(1) Appointment to the posts of Deputy Collector shall be made either by nomination or by promotion of suitable Mamlatdars.

Provided that the ratio of appointment by nomination and by promotion shall as far as possible, be 50:50.

Provided further that half the vacancies reserved for appointment by promotion shall be filled by directly recruited Mamlatdars who have put in at least seven years service in the post including the period spent on probation.

(2) Appointment by nomination shall be made on the result of a competitive examination in accordance with the rules hereto appended as Annexure I, from among candidates who.

(a) are not less than 20 and more than 25 years of age;

(b) possess a Bachelor s degree in Arts, Science, Agriculture, Commerce, Law, Engineering or a similar or higher degree of a recognised University; and

(c) Possess adequate knowledge of Marathi or Gujarati

(3) Candidates appointed by nomination shall be on probation for a period of two years, the probation being regulated according to the rules append hereto as annexure II .

(4) xx xx xx".

As a result of the second proviso in Rule 2 referred to above, out of 50 per cent of the promotees from the posts of Mamlatdars to those of the Deputy Collectors, 25 per cent was reserved for directly recruited Mamlatdars. In 1966, after the formation of the State of Gujarat, the Government of Gujarat slightly altered the recruitment rules relating to the posts of Deputy Collectors. The relevant rules may now be quoted:

"(1) Recruitment shall be made on temporary costs which are existing since two years and which are likely to be continued for one year and more excepting those posts which have been created for special work in Revenue Departments and are permanent posts in the cadre of Deputy Collectors.

(2) Appointment on this post shall be made in either of the following ways:

(a) By promotion of Mamlatdars of Gujarat Civil Service Class on proved merit and efficiency.

(b) By direct selection on the result of competitive examination in accordance with rules made by Government.

(3) The ratio of appointment in the available vacancies, by direct selection and promotion would be 50 : 50. But half the vacancies reserved for appointment by promotion shall be filled by directly recruited Mamlatdars who have put in at least seven year s service includ







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top