SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 249

A.N.GROVER, G.K.MITTER, K.S.HEGDE
Kani Ram – Appellant
Versus
Kazani – Respondent


Advocates:
O.C.MATHUR, P.C.BHARTARI, SARDAR BAHADUR SAHARYA, V.B.SAHARYA, YAUGINDRA KHUSHALANI

Judgement

GROVER, J.:- This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the Delhi High Court.

2. One Jaigopal instituted a suit for ejectment and recovery of rent under Clauses (a) and (e) of Section 13 of the Delhi and Ajmer Rent control Act 1952 in respect of a house situate in Pahargunj against the tenant. The grounds on which ejectment was sought were non-payment of rent and bona fide personal requirement of the landlord. The suit was resisted by the tenant on various grounds but ultimately on June 2, 1956 a decree for ejectment was passed on the basis of a compromise. The suit with regard to the recovery of arrears of rent was dismissed. On June 6, 1959, the decree holder filed an application for execution of the decree. The tenant raised various objections: one of the objections was that the decree sought to be executed was based on a compromise and not on any findings of the Court with the result that it was a nullity. On September 7, 1960 the Execution Court dismissed the objection and allowed the execution application of the landlord. That order was confirmed in appeal by the Additional Senior Sub-Judge on October 13, 1961. The judgment-debtor went up in revision but th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top