SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.M. SHELAT AND H.R. KHANNA, JJ.
Nishi Kanta Mondal, Petitioner
Versus
The State of W.B., Respondent.
Writ Petition No. 7 of 1972, D/- 18-4-1972.
Advocates appeared
Mr. H. K. Puri , Advocate, amicus curiae, for Petitioner, Mr. D. N. Mukherjee, Advocate and Mr. G. S. Chatterjee, Advocate for M/s. Sukumar Basu and Co., for Respondent.
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 356, 357 - West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 - Sections 3, 2, 10, 9 - Explosive Bombs Were Recovered - Propensity Of Petitioner To Use And Explode - In pursuance of above order petitioner was arrested and was served with order as well as ground of detention on same day - District Magistrate sent report to State Government about his having passed order for detention of petitioner grounds of detention and other necessary particulars were also sent along with report State Government after considering report and other particulars approved detention order - Representation made by petitioner against his detention was received by State Government – Held, It is also obvious that use of high explosive bombs was likely to disturb public order fact that high explosive bombs were recovered from petitioner and his associates and taken into possession before they could be used would not take case out of purview of clause earlier incident gives a clear indication of propensity of petitioner to use and explode such bombs recovery of high explosive bombs from possession of petitioner prevented him from using and exploding bombs and disturbing public order - Petition dismissed.
Judgement
KHANNA, J:- This is a petition through jail for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by Nishi Kanta Mondal who has been ordered by the District Magistrate, 24 Parganas to be detained under section 3 of the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 (President s Act No. 19 of 1970), hereinafter referred to as the Act. The order of detention reads as under:
"GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE 24-PARGANAS
ORDER
No. 352/71 Dated, the 6-7-71
Whereas I am satisfied with respect to the person known as Shri Nisi Kanta Mondal, son of Shri Radhanath Mondal of Daccapara, P. S. Bongaon, Dt. 24-Parganas that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, it is necessary so to do, I therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with sub-section (3) of section 3 of the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act 1970 (President s Act No. 19 of 1970), make this order directing that the said Nishi Kanta Mondal be detained.
Given under my hand and seal of office.
Sd/-
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
24-PARGANAS
6-7-1971
Seal
2. In pursuance of the above order, the petitioner was arrested on 8-7-1971 and was served with the order as well as the ground of detention on the same day. On July 10, 1971 the District Magistrate sent report to the State Government about his having passed the order for the detention of the petitioner. The grounds of detention and other necessary particulars were also sent along with the report The State Government, after considering the report and other particulars, approved the detention order on July 17, 1971. Representation made by the petitioner against his detention was received by the State Government on July 30, 1971. The representation was considering by the State Government and rejected on August, 5, 1971. The case of the petitioner was placed before the Advisory Board on August 6, 1971. The petitioner s representation was also sent to the Advisory Board. The Advisory Board, after considering the material placed before it as well as the representation sent by the petitioner and after giving him a hearing in person, submitted its report to the State Government on September 14, 1971. Opinion was expressed by the Advisory Board that there was sufficient cause for the detention of the petitioner. The State Government passed an order on October 5, 1971 confirming the order for the detention of the petitioner. The confirmation order was thereafter communicated to the petitioner.
3. The petition has been resisted by the State of West Bengal and the affidavit of Shri Chandi Charan Bose, Deputy Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of West Bengal has been filed in opposition to the petition.
4. Mr. Puri has addressed argument amicus curiae on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondent State has been represented by Mr. D. N. Mukherjee. The first contention which has been advanced by Mr. Puri is that the Act was enacted by the President in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the West Bengal State Legislature (Delegation of Powers) Act, 1970. According to section 3 of the last mentioned Act, the power of the Legislature of the State of West Bengal to make laws, which had been declared by the Proclamation to be exercisable by or under the authority of Parliament, was conferred on the President. In the exercise of the said power, the President could, from time to time whether Parliament was or was not in session, enact, as a President s Act, a Bill containing such provisions as he considered necessary. Some other formalities, detailed in section 3, were also required to be complied with by the President, but it is not necessary for the purpose of this case to refer to them. Section 2 of the aforesaid Act defined "Proclamation" to mean the Proclamation issued on the 19th day of March, 1970, under Article 356 of the Constitution by the President, and published with the notification of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.