SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 485

K.S.HEGDE, A.N.GROVER
State Of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Nathabhai Desaibhai Patel – Respondent


Judgement

HEGDE, J:- This is an appeal by Certificate from the decision of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The defendant in the suit is the appellant herein. The plaintiff therein is the respondent. The plaintiff claimed a sum of Rs. 89,408-15-6 as being the principal and interest on the amount illegally realised from him on the ground that the amount collected by him as sales tax from his customers is payable to the Government. The principal amount claimed is Rs. 62,518-8-0.

2. The Trial Court came to the conclusion that the collection in question was illegal. But it dismissed the suit on the ground that the same was bared by limitation.

3. In appeal, the High Court disagreeing with the view taken by the Trial Court decreed the principal amount claimed by the plaintiff and interest on the same at 5 per cent per annum from the date of the suit. It came to the conclusion that the suit was within time. The defendant did not challenge the finding of the Trail Court as to its liability.

4. In this Court, the counsel for the appellant-defendant did not contest the correctness of the decision of the High Court on the question of limitation. The only contention urged by him was that the Hig



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top