SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 281

G.K.MITTER, K.K.MATHEW, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
Ajit Prasad Ramkishan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

MATHEW, J.:- This appeal, by special leave, is from the judgment of the High Court of Bombay, convicting the appellant under section 16 (1) (a) (I) read with Section 7 (I) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (Act 37 of 1954), hereinafter called the Act , and sentencing him to undergo R. I. for 6 months and pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and, in default of payment of fine, to undergo R. I. for a further period of two months.

2. The appellant was the owner of a sweet meat shop on Kurla-Andheri Road, Bombay, On July 1, 1965, the Food Inspector of the Bombay Municipal Corporation visited his shop at 9.55 A.M. and took a sample of unboiled buffalo milk after conforming to the formalities enjoined by the Act. The Food Inspector divided the sample into three parts, retained two parts with him and delivered the other part to accused No. 2, who alone was in the shop at the time. The Food Inspector sent one part for analysis by the Public Analyst. Exhibit B is the report of the Analyst. That showed the fat content of milk as only 2.7 per cent instead of 6 per cent as required by the rules framed under the Act. On the basis of the report the accused were prosecuted.

3. Accused No. 1













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top