SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 184

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, I.D.DUA
Shiva Bangles Stores – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal (Iii) U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

JUDGMENT:- In this appeal by Special Leave the Appellant challenges the order of the High Court more or less dismissing in limine the Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 4025 of 1970 filed by the Appellant for quashing the award of the Industrial Tribunal, Lucknow.

2. The claim of the workmen was for payment of bonus at the maximum rate fixed under the Payment of Bonus Act 1965, namely 20 per cent. It is seen from the award of the Tribunal that the proceedings were adjourned to enable the Appellant to enter appearance and contest the proceedings. According to the Tribunal though the Appellant had been properly served it remained absent. On this basis the Tribunal set them ex parate and on the sole oral evidence so to say adduced on the side of the workmen has accepted the case of the respondents that the concern has made a profit of about Rs. 2. 75 lacs in the year 1967-68 for which bonus was claimed. The Tribunal has also accepted the oral evidence that the Appellant is a very flourishing concern. Quite naturally as the Appellant did not appear before the Tribunal the latter ultimately passed the award in question directing the Appellant to pay the bonus at the maximum ra







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top