P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, K.K.MATHEW, K.S.HEGDE
Chander Bhan – Appellant
Versus
Bal Mukand – Respondent
Judgment
HEGDE, J.:- There is no substance in this appeal. The Appellant claims to be a sub-tenant under the first Respondent who is a tenant under the second Respondent. The second Respondent filed a petition for evicting the appellant and the first Respondent from the suit premises on certain grounds. His application was rejected by the rent Controller. But in appeal, the Rent Control Tribunal reversed the Order of the Rent Controller and decreed the second Respondent s claim. Thereafter, the appellant filed a second appeal before the High Court of Delhi on April 28, 1969. Under the rules of the High Court the Appellant was required to file along with his appeal memo, the judgment and decree appealed against as well as the judgment of the Trial court. At the time of the filing of the appeal, none of these documents were filed, but an application was made to the High Court to dispense with the production of those documents. The High Court ordered that those documents should be produced within the time prescribed for filing the appeal. It appears that the judgment and decree of the first Appellate Court was produced before the High Court on July 15, 1969 though the High Court had re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.