SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 38

P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, K.K.MATHEW, K.S.HEGDE
Chander Bhan – Appellant
Versus
Bal Mukand – Respondent


Advocates:
JITENDRA, O.N.MOHINDRU, TARA CHANDRA SHARMA, Uma Datta

Judgment

HEGDE, J.:- There is no substance in this appeal. The Appellant claims to be a sub-tenant under the first Respondent who is a tenant under the second Respondent. The second Respondent filed a petition for evicting the appellant and the first Respondent from the suit premises on certain grounds. His application was rejected by the rent Controller. But in appeal, the Rent Control Tribunal reversed the Order of the Rent Controller and decreed the second Respondent s claim. Thereafter, the appellant filed a second appeal before the High Court of Delhi on April 28, 1969. Under the rules of the High Court the Appellant was required to file along with his appeal memo, the judgment and decree appealed against as well as the judgment of the Trial court. At the time of the filing of the appeal, none of these documents were filed, but an application was made to the High Court to dispense with the production of those documents. The High Court ordered that those documents should be produced within the time prescribed for filing the appeal. It appears that the judgment and decree of the first Appellate Court was produced before the High Court on July 15, 1969 though the High Court had re




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top