SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 649

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY AND D.G. PALEKAR, JJ.
Mohd. Munna and Others, Petitioners
Versus
State of W.B., Respondent.
Writ Petn. Nos. 231, 284-286, 328-330, 305, 310 and 312 of 1971, D/- 7-12-1971.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 – Article 21.22 and 32 - West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act 1970 – Detention order - These are petitions under Article 32 challenging detention made under West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act 1970 - In these Writ Petitions opinion of Advisory Board has been confirmed by State Government on respective dates, which are beyond 3 months from date of arrest of petitioners - They were adjourned till today for facilitating him to produce the order - He has reported that he has not been able to get any definite information whether Article 21 and 22 have been suspended by the President under Article 359 - Court are now informed by Registrar that no such order has been made - Court are, therefore, free to consider these cases – Held, it will be seen from facts stated above that in all those Writ Petitions the mandatory provisions of Act with regard to detention have been duly observed except that confirmation and continuation of detention order under Section 12 has not been made within 3 months from date of detention. In this view the further detention becomes illegal and accordingly - Petitions are allowed and petitioners are directed to be released forthwith - Petitions allowed.

Judgment

P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J. : - These are petitions under Article 32 challenging the detention made under the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act 1970 (hereinafter called the Act). In these Writ Petitions the opinion of the Advisory Board has been confirmed by the State Government on respective dates, which are beyond 3 months from the date of arrest of the petitioners. We have in the judgment pronounced in Writ Petition No. 218 of 71 = (reported in AIR 1972 SC 1924) held that the confirmation and commuincation by the Government of the order of detention beyond 3 months makes the detention illegal. Mr. P. K. Chatterjee who appeared for the State of West Bengal brought to our notice that President has promulgated emergency and wanted time to examine that order when these matters came up for hearing yesterday, the 6th December, 1971. They were adjourned till today for facilitating him to produce the order. He has reported that he has not been able to get any definite information whether Article 21 and 22 have been suspended by the President under Article 359. We are now informed by the Registrar that no such order has been made. We are, therefore, free to consider these cases.

W. P. No. 231 of 1971.

2. The order of detention in this case was made on 11-1-71, on which date the State Government was also informed. The detenu was arrested on 17-1-71 and served with the orders of detention and the grounds therefor. The State Government approved the detention order on 19-1-71 and on the same day made a report to the Central Government. The case was placed before the Advisory Board on 15-2-71. Two representations were made by the detenu on 4-2-71 and 13-2-71. These representations were considered by the State Government and rejected on 6-3-71. The Advisory Board gave its opinion on 27-3-71 and the detention order was confirmed by the State Government on 4-8-71.

W.P. No. 284 of 1971.

3. The order of detention in this case was made on 2-4-71, on which date the State Government was also informed. The detenu was arrested on 8-4-71, on which date the orders of detention and the grounds therefor were also served on the detenu. A report was made to the State Government on 2-4-71 and the State Government approved that order on 10-4-71. On the same day it sent a report to the Central Government. The case was placed before the Board on 7-5-71. Before that a representation was received on 23-4-71, which was considered by the Government are rejected on 8-6-71. The Advisory Board s opinion was given on 14-6-71 which was confirmed by the State Government on 21-8-71.

W. P. No. 285 of 1971.

4. The detention order in this case was made on 26-12-70 and on the same day communicated to the State Government, which approved of it on 4-1-71. On the same day a report was made by the State Government to the Central Government. Two representations were received on 11-1-71 and 1-2-71. These were considered by the State Government on 21-1-71 and 9-2-71, and rejected. On 25-1-71 the case was placed before the Advisory Board which gave its opinion on 12-2-71. The order of detention was confirmed on 30-7-71.

W. P. No. 286 of 1971.

5. The order of detention in this case was made on 14-2-71 and on the same day it was reported to the State Government, which approved of it on 25-2-71. The petitioner was arrested on 17-2-71, on which date the orders of detention and grounds therefor were also served on the detenu. A report was also made to the Central Government on 25-2-71. A representation was received on 11-3-71 which was considered and rejected by the State Government on 8-4-71. On 18-3-71 the case was placed before the Advisory Board which gave its opinion on 23-4-71. The detention order was confirmed by the State Government on 10-8-71.

W. P. No. 328 of 1971.

6. The order of detention in this case was made on 16-4-71 and sent to the Government for approval on the same day and the Government approved of it on 26-4-71, and made a report on the same day to the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top