SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 420

D.G.PALEKAR, J.M.SHELAT, S.N.DWIVEDI
Management Of D. T. U. – Appellant
Versus
B. B. L. Hajelay – Respondent


Advocates:
D.N.Vohra, H.K.PURI, M.C.CHAGLA, R.K.P.SHANKAR DAS, S.K.DHINGRA, S.K.DHOLAKIA

Judgment

PALEKAR, J.:- This is an appeal from the judgment and Order dated January 21, 1971 of the Delhi High Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 719/1969.

2. Respondent no. 2 Ved Prakash was originally employed as a Driver in the Delhi Road Transport Authority which had been constituted under the Delhi Road Transport Authority Act, 1950. The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 came into force in January, 1958. By section 516 (1) (a) of the Corporation Act, the Delhi Road Transport Authority Act, 1950, stood repealed and in virtue of several other sections of the Corporation Act the functions of the Delhi Road Transport Authority were taken over by the Corporation. Under section 511 every officer and employee of the Transport Authority stood transferred to and became an officer and employee of the Corporation. Thus respondent no. 2 became an employee of the Corporation from January, 1958.

3. A disciplinary enquiry was started against respondent no. 2 by the Assistant General Manager (Transport) in 1962 and the Assistant General Manager decided to remove respondent no. 2 from service with effect from 16-5-1963. At that time an Industrial dispute was pending before respondent no. 1 the P
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top