SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 421

A.N.RAY, I.D.DUA, K.K.MATHEW
Jagdish Chandra Dheyshyam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

RAY, J. - This appeal is by certificate from the judgment dated 21 February, 1966 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.

2. The appellant at a public auction held by the Estate Officer, Capital Project, Chandigarh on 21 December, 1958 purchased site No. 43 in the Grain Market, Chandigarh. The purchase price was Rs. 94,000. 25% of the sale price was payable at the fall of the hammer. The balance sum with interest was payable in three equal instalments of Rs. 25.615 each. The appellant paid Rs. 23,500 being 25% of the sale price at the fall of the hammer. The appellant paid a further sum of Rs. 21,992 towards the first instalment. A sum of Rs. 3623 was outstanding on the first instalment. The appellant made inprovements on the site. The appellant raised construction thereon at his own expense. He invested about Rs. 1,50,000 in the shape of building and machinery. The appellant could not pay Rs. 3,623 being the balance of the first instalment and the second and the third instalments amounting to Rs. 25,615 each.

3. The appellant asked for instalments because the appellant was in financial difficulty. Eventually, the Estate Officer on 2 January, 1962 resumed the s




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top