SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 506

A.N.RAY, D.G.PALEKAR, M.H.BEG, S.N.DWIVEDI
Venkatamma – Appellant
Versus
City Improvement Of Trust Board, Mysore – Respondent


Judgment

DWIVEDI, J. :- These two appeals are filed against the judgment of the Mysore High Court dismissing the writ petitions of the appellants, Smt. Venkatamma and certain other persons are the appellants in Civil Appeal No. 1488 of 1968. U. L. Vishwanatha Rao and certain other persons are the appellants in Civil Appeal No. 1489 of 1968.

2. The dispute in the appeals relates to the acquisition of certain premises belonging to the appellants. Those premises have been acquired by the Board of Trustees for the improvement of the City of Mysore constituted under the City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903, (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Pursuant to the acquisition, awards determining compensation were given in due course. The appellants filed writ petitions challenging the legality of the acquisition and awards and prayed for the quashing of the notification acquiring the premises and the awards. The High Court dismissed in toto the writ petition of Smt. Venkatamma and others. The writ petition of U. L. Vishwanatha Rao and others was partly allowed in respect of certain premises.

3. Section 14 (1) of the Act enables the Board of Trustees (hereinafter called the Board) to draw up sc










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top