SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 454

H.R.KHANNA, K.S.HEGDE, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
D. M. Manasvi – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gujarat Ii, Ahmedabad – Respondent


Advocates:
M.C.CHAGLA, N.D.Karkhanis

Judgment

KHANNA, J. :- This judgment would dispose of four civil appeals Nos. 1447 to 1450 of 1969 which have been filed by the assessee by special leave against the judgment of Gujarat High Court whereby that court answered the following two questions in a reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in the affirmative and in favour of the department :

"(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the proceedings for the imposition of penalty were properly commenced in the course of any proceedings under the Act as required by Section 271 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1959-60 to 1962-63?

(2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, there was any material or evidence before the Tribunal to hold that the assessee had deliberately concealed particulars of his income or deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars of such income as required by S. 271 (1) (c) of the Act for the assessment years 1959-60 to 1962-63?"

2. While answering question No. 1 in the affirmative, the High Court observed that so far as the assessment year 1961-62 was concerned the penalty proceedings were inv


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top