SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 478

I.D.DUA, K.S.HEGDE, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Leyland LTD. – Respondent


Judgment

HEGDE, J. :- The Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras is appealing against the decision of the Madras High Court in a Reference under Section 66 (2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (to be hereinafter referred to as the Act) after obtaining certificate of fitness from the High Court.

2. The question before the authorities under the Act was whether the payment of Rs. 2,50,000/- made by the respondent-assessee which will hereinafter be referred to as the "company" for the termination of managing agency is an allowable deduction in computing the total income of the company for 1956-57. The Income-tax Officer as well as the Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejected the claim of the Company that it was a Revenue expenditure but the Tribunal in appeal upheld the contention of the Company. Aggrieved by the decision of the Tribunal, the Commissioner demanded a case to be stated for obtaining the opinion of the High Court on the question:

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the payment of Rs. 2,50,000/- made for the termination of Managing Agency is an allowable deduction in computing the total income of the assessee company for 1956-57."

3. The Tribunal refused






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top