SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 169

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N. GROVER, A.N. RAY AND D.G. PALEKAR, JJ.
Sathi Prasad, Appellant
Versus
The State of U.P., Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 123 of 1969, D/- 15-3-1972.
Advocates appeared
Mr. Frank Anthony, Sr. Advocate, (Mr. K. B. Rohtgi, Advocate with him), for Appellant; Mr. O. P. Rana Advocate, for Respondent.

Advocates:
FRANK ANTHONY, K.B.ROHTAGI, O.P.RANA

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 – Section 218,394 and 404 – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Section 164 - Causing hurt - Dishonest - Appellant was head-constable at Police out-post under the Police Station which was Ram Naumi day a large number of persons had come to Ayodhya to have a dip in the holy river - There was a large crowd on the bridge over river - Bridge gave way - Many persons were drowned –Their dead bodies could not be recovered - A search party met the Deputy Inspector General of Police and Commissioner of Division - They have information to search party that some dead bodies were seen near village - They made enquiries at place - Person gave information that dead body had been recovered from body by certain boatmen but same had been taken away from boatmen by someone in Police - Whether appellant had further directed that the facts should not be disclosed and the dead body should be thrown into current of river – Held, High Court upheld conviction and sentences passed by Sessions Court - High Court correctly held that the offence under Section 394 of Indian Penal Code was established on the evidence - Sessions Court as well as the High Court accepted evidence of prosecution witnesses that articles were not given voluntarily by one to the appellant - It was, therefore, said that there would be no offence under Section 218 of Indian Penal Code - This point was not canvassed at trial Court or in High Court - This requires elucidation of facts - Both in the trial Court and in the High Court the case proceeded on basis that the appellant as a public servant was charged with preparation of record or other writing and he committed offence within meaning of Section 218 of the Indian Penal Code - For the foregoing reasons the appeal fails and is dismissed - Appellant will surrender to his bail and serve out the sentence - Appeal dismissed.

Judgment

RAY, J. :- This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment dated 16 January, 1969 of the High Court at Allahabad.

2. The High Court upheld the order and judgment of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Faizabad convicting the appellant and sentencing him to 5 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 3 years, rigorous imprisonment under Sec. 404 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 218 of the Indian Penal Code. The sentences were to run concurrently.

3. The appellant was head-constable at the Police out-post Baghanala under the Police Station Chhaoni in the District of Basti, Uttar Pradesh. On 10 April, 1965 which was Ram Naumi day a large number of persons had come to Ayodhya to have a dip in the holy river Saryu and a Darshan of the temples. There was a large crowd on the bridge over the river. The bridge gave way. Many persons were drowned. Bachchan Lal Srivastava, an Advocate and his brother Triloki Nath Srivastava an Overseer and Bachchan Lal Srivastava s clerk Jugal Kishore and two other Advocates Shri Shanker Singh P. W. 1 and Shri Jagdamba Prasad Singh P. W. 6 were pilgrims to the river Saryu on that day. The Srivastava brothers and the clerk were drowned. Their dead bodies could not be recovered. A search party met the Deputy Inspector General of Police and the Commissioner of Division on 12 April, 1965. They have information to the search party that some dead bodies were seen near Vikram Jot village. The party went to Vikram Jot. They made enquiries at the place. A person gave information that the dead body of a stout person wearing white bush-shirt and a pair of steel colour terrylene trousers had been found near Sahjaura Pathak village and a wrist watch, a gold ring and some money had been recovered from the body by certain boatmen but the same had been taken away from the boatmen by some one in the Police.

4. The search party along with the chowkidar and the person who gave information proceeded to village Sahjaura Pathak. There the Party met the Mallahs who were the boatmen. They were Munnu Lal Mallah, P. W. 8 and Daya Ram Mallah P. W. 9 and Jassi Mallah. The party was headed by Shri Shanker Singh, Advocate P. W. 1 and along with him was his client Sri Ram P. W. 12 who was Up-Pradhan of the village. The party was taken by the three Mallahs on a boat across the river. Daya Ram P. W. 12 showed the dead body which had been reduced to bones by vultures. A belt, an underwear and a pair of trousers were still on the body. Shri Shanker Singh, P. W. 1 and his companions recognised from the teeth of the dead body to be that of Bachchan Lal Srivastava. The party carried the dead body to village Sahjaura Pathak.

5. The party thereafter went to the Police out-post Baghanala along with Daya Ram P. W. 9. Daya Ram P. W. 9 was one of the Mallahs. The party went inside the Police out-post Baghanala and met the appellant. Shri Shanker Singh enquired from the appellant if any dead body had been recovered that day from the river from which Daya Ram had removed a wrist watch, a gold ring and Rs. 17.75 all of which soon after, had been taken away by the appellant from Daya Ram after beating and threatening him and whether the appellant had further directed that the facts should not be disclosed and the dead body should be thrown into the current of the river. The appellant denied the story. Thereupon Shri Shanker Singh, P. W. 1 called Daya Ram who narrated the facts including the version that the appellant had threatened that the facts should not be disclosed to anyone that the dead body should be thrown into the current of the river. The appellant replied that Daya Ram was telling a lie.

6. At the instance of Shanker Singh the general diary of the Baghanala Police out-post relating to 12 April, 1965 was shown. The diary showed that the Police left the outpost at 6.40 a.m. on 12 April, 1965 in search of dead bodies and the Police party returned to the out-post at 6-10












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top