SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 95

P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, H.R.KHANNA
Bali Ram Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Mysore – Respondent


Advocates:
B.B.TAVAKLEY, M.VIRAPPA, P.GUPTA

Judgment

KHANNA, J. :- Bali Ram Prasad was convicted by Magistrate Ist Class Shorapur under Section 409, Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 90 days and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- or in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of one month. On appeal the Sessions Judge Gulbarga maintained the conviction of the accused but reduced the sentence of imprisonment to the period already undergone. The sentence of fine and of imprisonment in default was maintained. Revision filed by the accused was dismissed by the High Court of Mysore. Bali Ram Prasad has now come up in appeal to this Court by special leave.

2. The prosecution case is that during the years 1959 and 1960 the accused was posted as Revenue Inspector in Shorapur Tehsil in Gulbarga District. Some amount was due from Bhimsha, excise contractor and in that connection, Rs. 946/- were paid by Bhimsha to the accused on January 22, 1959 as per receipts P-2, P-3 and P-4 for Rs. 730/-, Rs. 106/- and Rs. 110/- respectively. The accused deposited Rs. 810/- out of the amount realised from Bhimsha on January 27, 1959 in the treasury and failed to deposit the balance. Rs. 136









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top