H.R.KHANNA, K.S.HEGDE, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Poona – Appellant
Versus
Manna Ramji And Company – Respondent
Judgment
KHANNA, J. :- This appeal on certificate granted by the Bombay High Court is directed against the judgment of the Court whereby it answered the question referred to it under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in favour of the respondent assessee.
2. The reference arose out of the assessment made upon the respondent firm for the assessment year 1951-52, the account year for which is the Samvat year 2006 (that is, October 22, 1949 to November 9, 1950). The respondent was carrying on business for several years in the past in timber under the name and style of Manna Ramji & Co. in Bhavani Peth Poona City. The business premises consisted of an office and six sheds used for storing wood and timber of all kinds. The respondent firm constructed the six sheds for the purpose of its business after taking the site threof on a long lease. On May 19, 1944 the Collector of Poona requisitioned the premises of the respondent under the Defence of India Act as from May 19, 1944 for the purpose of using them as store houses for food grains. Initially the requisition order covered the six sheds as well as the office of the respondent, but at t
followed : Commssioner of Income TaxiExcess Profits Tax, Bombay City v. Shamshr Printing Press
Senairam Doongamall v. Ccommissioner of incame Tax
S R Sivaram Prasad Bahadur v. Commissioner of Income Tax Andhra Pradesh
Commissioner of Income Tax Punjab Haryana Jammu and Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh v. Prabhu Dayal
referred : Commissioner of Incom Tax, Nagpur v. Rai Bahadur Jairam Valji
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.