SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 507

A.N.GROVER, K.K.MATHEW
Narindrajit Singh And Ranjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

GROVER, J. :- These two appeals by certificate from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court must succeed on the short ground that the provisions of Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, were not complied with. In C. A. 1192/67 a notification was issued under Section 4 of the Act on October 15, 1960 for acquisition of the land in dispute. Under Section 17 (4) of the Act the provisions of Sec. 5-A were dispensed with. On October 28, 1960 the notification under Section 6 was issued. The appellant was directed to be present before the Collector in pursuance of a notice under Section 9 on December 4, 1960. On December 5, 1960 the appellant filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisition proceedings. 553 The petition was dismissed by a Single Judge of the High Court whose judgment was affirmed in Special Appeal by the Divison Bench. Section 4 (1) of the Act is in the following terms :-

"Whenever it appears to the appropriate Government that land in any locality is needed or is likely to be needed for any public purpose, a notification to that effect shall be published in the Official Gazette, and the Collector shall cause public notice







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top