SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 1

D.G.PALEKAR, K.S.HEGDE, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
Chandrakant Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Maharaja Martand Singh – Respondent


Judgment

HEGDE, J. :- This appeal under Sec. 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 is directed against the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissing the election petition filed by the Appellant on the ground that the same is barred by limitation.

2. The election petitioner is a voter in the Rewa Parliamentary constituency. The election with which we are concerned in this appeal was to the Parliament. That election was held on March 1, 1971. The counting was over on March 10, 1971. The same day the election results were announced. The respondent was declared elected. The election results were published in the official gazette on March 15, 1971. The election petition was filed on April 29, 1971.

3. Section 81 (1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, provides that an election petition calling in question any election may be presented on one or more of the grounds specified in sub-section (1) of Section 100 and Section 101 to the High Court by any candidate at such election or by any elector within fortyfive days from, but not earlier than, the date of election of the returned candidate, or if there are more than one returned candidate at the election an









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top