SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 310

K.K.MATHEW, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
M. Sambasiva Rao – Appellant
Versus
Union of Indias – Respondent


Judgment

P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J. :- By this petition, the petitioner challenges his detention in committal proceedings in which 146 persons have been charged with various offences of conspiracy, murder, abduction, etc. The petitioner s complaint is that he and the other accused have not been produced before a magistrate for remand, as required by the Criminal Procedure Code, but have been kept in jails and the remand orders have been passed in their absence, which, according to the petitioner, is illegal. This contention, however, is not sustainable having regard to a Full Bench decision of seven Judges of this Court, reported in Raj Narain v. Superintendent, Central Jail, New Delhi 1971 (2) SCR 147 which by majority of five to two has held that the remand cannot be considered to be invalid merely because an accused has not been produced before the magistrate.

2. The other complaint of the petitioner is that the committal proceedings have been unduly delayed on some pretext or the other. The police have been giving excuses not only for his non-production but also for not proceeding with the case. The learned advocate for the respondent State has taken us through the affidavit filed b



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top