K.K.MATHEW, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
M. Sambasiva Rao – Appellant
Versus
Union of Indias – Respondent
Judgment
P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J. :- By this petition, the petitioner challenges his detention in committal proceedings in which 146 persons have been charged with various offences of conspiracy, murder, abduction, etc. The petitioner s complaint is that he and the other accused have not been produced before a magistrate for remand, as required by the Criminal Procedure Code, but have been kept in jails and the remand orders have been passed in their absence, which, according to the petitioner, is illegal. This contention, however, is not sustainable having regard to a Full Bench decision of seven Judges of this Court, reported in Raj Narain v. Superintendent, Central Jail, New Delhi 1971 (2) SCR 147 which by majority of five to two has held that the remand cannot be considered to be invalid merely because an accused has not been produced before the magistrate.
2. The other complaint of the petitioner is that the committal proceedings have been unduly delayed on some pretext or the other. The police have been giving excuses not only for his non-production but also for not proceeding with the case. The learned advocate for the respondent State has taken us through the affidavit filed b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.