SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 102

J.M.SHELAT, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Patel India Private – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
N.S.BINDRA, S.K.DHOLAKIA, S.N.PRASAD, S.P.NAIR, VINIT KUMAR

Judgment

SHELAT, J.: - At all material times, the appellant-company acted as the sole distributing agent in India for the products of M/s. Sawyer s Inc., Portland, U.S.A., and as such used to import View-master stereoscopes, reels etc. The customs authorities used to levy import duty on the basis of the invoice price under Section 29 read with S. 30 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 as being the real value of the goods so imported.

2. During the year 1954-55, the appellant company imported several items set out in Annexure D to the appellant s special leave petition, the details of which it is not necessary to set out here. When items 1 and 2 arrived in Bombay port, the customs authorities, ignoring their hitherto followed practice, refused to accept the invoice price as the real value and levied excess duty in the aggregate sum of Rs. 1356. An appeal to the Customs Collector failed whereupon the appellant-company lodged a revision application before the Government of India.

3. Pending the disposal of the said revision, several other items set out in the said annexure D arrived in Bombay port, in respect of which the Customs, refusing to accept their invoice price, charged the appellan





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top