SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 99

D.G.PALEKAR, A.N.RAY, M.H.BEG
Fatima Bi – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Custodian General, Evacuee Property, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.ARORA, K.R.NAGARAJA, M.Qamaruddin, N.C.SIKRI, P.PARMESHVARAN, S.K.MEHTA, S.P.NAIR

Judgment

RAY, J.:- This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment dated 21 November, 1969 of the Delhi High Court dismissing the writ petition of the appellants.

2. The appellants made an application under Article 226 of the Constitution in the Delhi High Court. The appellants asked for quashing two orders dated 29 April, 1964 and 1 February, 1965. On 29 April, 1964 the Deputy Custodian General issued a notice to the appellant Fatima Bi to show cause why the order dated 11 January, 1956 should not be revised as the same was obtained by fraud and was illegal. The appellant Fatima Bi made an application for cancelling the notice requiring her to show cause. On 1 February, 1965 the Deputy Custodian General passed an order rejecting the objections of the appellant Fatima Bi. By the said order dated 1 February, 1965 the authorised Deputy Custodian was asked to expedite recording of evidence and submission of report.

3. The appellant Fatima Bi is the wife of the appellant Mohd. Sayeed. The appellant Fatima Bi s case is that she is the owner of certain property at Delhi. By an ex parte order dated 25 November, 1953 the Assistant Custodian declared her as evacuee and her property to











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top