SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 147

H.R.KHANNA, K.S.HEGDE
Haji Lal Mohd. Biri Works, Allahabad Through Abdul Hamid – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

KHANNA, J.:- This appeal on certificate is directed against the Full Bench decision of Allahabad High Court whereby that court answered by a majority of two to one the following question referred to it by a Division Bench in the negative against the assessee-appellant:

"Whether, in order to recover interest under Section 8 (1-A) of the U. P. Sales Tax-Act, it is necessary for the Sales Tax Officer to make an assessment order in respect of the interest and to issue a notice of demand in respect of such interest."

2. The appellant, a partnership firm, is a large-scale manufacturer of biris. The appellant was assessed to tax under the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (U. P. Act No. 15 of 1948) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the assessment years 1957-58 and 1958-59 a per assessment orders dated June 10, 1959 and February 12, 1963 respectively. On an application sent by the appellant to the Minister of Finance U. P. Government requesting for compounding of tax, an order was issued on May 6, 1959 staying the recovery of tax due from the appellant. The stay order was vacated by order date September 25, 1967. On October, 9, 1967 the Sales Tax Officer sent a recovery certificate to




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top