SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 266

S.N.DWIVEDI, M.H.BEG, K.K.MATHEW, A.N.RAY, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Hari Prasad Mulshanker Trivedi – Appellant
Versus
V. B. Raju – Respondent


Advocates:
B.SEN, I.M.SHROFF, S.K.Bisaria

Judgment

MATHEW, J:- In this appeal by special leave, the question for consideration is whether the findings arrived at by the High Court of Gujarat in Election Petition No. 9 of 1972 on issues Nos. 1 and 5, which were tried as preliminary issues, are correct.

2. An election to elect four members of the Council of States from the State of Gujarat was to be held on April 8, 1972.

3. The appellant and respondents nos. 1 to 5 filed nominations. On scrutiny the returning officer held them to be valid. On April 8, 1972, the election was held at Gandhi Nagar and the appellant and respondents 2, 3 and 5 were declared elected.

4. On May 1, 1972, respondent no. 1 filed the election petition to declare the elections of the appellant and respondents 2, 3 and 5 void.

5. The main ground urged in the election petition for declaring the election of respondents 4 and 5 in the election petition (respondent 5 and the appellant respectively here) void-with which alone we are concerned in this appeal-was that they were not ordinarily resident in the area covered by any parliamentary constituency in the State of Gujarat and that their names had been illegally entered in the electoral roll of the respective








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top