SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 289

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.R. KHANNA AND A. ALAGIRISWAMI JJ.
Giani Bakshish Singh, Appellant
Versus
Govt. of India and others, Respondents.
Criminal Appeal No. 116 of 1973, D/-18-9-1973.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226, Article 51, 14, 19 and 22 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 49l - Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 - Section 3 (2), 3 (1) (a) (i) & (ii) - Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Section 3 (1) (b) - Foreigners Act, 1946 - Section 3 (2) (c), 3 (2) - British Citizen - Came to India - Order of Detention - Whether appellant could be detained in order that he might be expelled - Whether he could continue to be detained except for that purpose - Whether they be inside country or outside - Whether he could be detained in this country when he is found in this country - Whether if appellant had not come to this country at all and stayed in England - Whether they are Indian citizens or foreigners, who have committed crimes in this country but have escaped to another country - Whether anything could be done about them - Whether activity for which a person is detained is one prejudicial to defence of India – Held, It was urged that only where grounds of detention were based on facts which can be held to amount to an offence either in India or in a foreign country for which he could be punished could he be detained – Court is not able to appreciate import of this argument - As is well known, preventive detention is not a punishment for an offence - Argument is that Chief Minister s reply shows that appellant has been detained, and is continued to be detained, not for reasons which were intimated to him in form of grounds of detention but really for reasons mentioned in Assembly and detention is therefore, bad - It is pertinent to remember in this context firstly that order for detention of appellant was made by District Magistrate - He could not have known of activities of appellant which Chief Minister mentioned in Assembly - There is no warrant for such an assumption - Except that one of activities is said to be in 1971, Court do not even know about dates of others - Moreover, Chief Minister s reply was in answer to demand of Akali Dal Party for appellant s release - Grounds of appellant s detention must have been known to them - Chief Minister should, therefore, have been giving them additional information which came to his knowledge subsequently – Court is not, therefore, prepared to assume that grounds for approvaI of appellant s detention were not same ground on which he was detained but some others, and therefore malice in law has been established - By a Presidential order Articles 14, 19 and :22 of Constitution have been suspended during subsistence of Proclamation of Emergency - This contention is based on decisions of this Court interpreting Article 22 - They are, therefore, irrelevant in considering a petition under Section 491 Cr. P. C - Appeal Dismissed.

Judgment

ALAGIRISWAMI, J.:- This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissing the appellant s petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 49l Cr. P. C for the issue of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for his production before the court and to be set at liberty. The appellant is a British citizen, employed in the Accounts Branch. Head Post Office. Birmingham and General Secretary of the United Kingdom Akali Dal. He came to India on 6-11-1972 to attend the Bhog ceremony of Sant Fateh Singh who died on 30th October, 1972. He was arrested on 16-11-1972 in pursuance of an order for his detention under the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 3 read with Section 3 (1) (a) (i) & (ii) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971. This order was approved by the State Government on 27-11-1972. The Advisory Board s report in respect of the detention was made on 4-1 -1973 and the State Government confirmed the order of detention on 16-1-1973 The grounds of detention were as follows:

"(a) That you on 11-11-72 held secret meeting in Gurdwara Rani Bazar Sharifpura, Amritsar at 7.00p. m................In the meeting you told them that the Sikhs could not get justice at the hands of Hindus in India. Therefore, it was necessary to secure Home Land for Sikhs by resorting to the use of force as the Bania Government at the Centre could not accept the demand of Sikh Home Land by persuasion or other peaceful means. You further assured them that there was no paucity of funds with U. K. Akali Dal and sufficient amount could be made available which could be spent in the achievement of Home Land on the lines suggested above. You also informed them that your organisation (U. K. Akali Dal) had made Rs. 50,000/- available in India for use for the achievement of the Home Land. You further told them that you could also be receiving sufficient money from your organisation in U. K in the near future. You further exhorted them to organise the movement in a systematic manner, raising volunteers and setting offices at suitable places in Punjab. You further directed them to collect arms, explosives etc. for use for the achievement of the object at the proper time. You further instigated them to create hatred amongst Hindus and Sikhs and cause communal disturbances in Punjab. You also advised them to enlist large number of paid workers who could work as "suicide squads" at the proper time and till then their services could be used in doing propaganda in the villages for creating favourable atmosphere amongst the Sikh masses in support of the creation of Sikh Home Land.

"(b) That you on 12-11-1973 again addressed a secret meeting in Gurdwara Rani Bazar. Sharifpura, Amritsar at 8.00 p.m............. In this meeting you instigated them that the Sikh community could not survive in India in the present Hindu Raj. Therefore, the Sikhs must secure separate Home Land by force so that they could live with honour and dignity. You further added that Sikhs could only prosper if separate Home Land for Sikhs is achieved. You further instigated them that they would have to make all sorts of efforts including use of arms and indulgence in violence in order to achieve the Home Land. You further exhorted them to enlist the services of young elements in the Sikhs who would work wholeheartedly for the achievement of the Home Land and were prepared to make big sacrifices. You further informed them that your organisation (U. K. Akali Dal) would be prepared to provide them with any amount they would be requiring for organising the movement and for purchasing the arms etc. You further suggested that they should create cells in the Sikh Units of Armed Forces of India and police for enlisting their sympathy and support which would be of great help for the creation of the Home Land. You also instigated them to create hatred amongst the Hindus and Sikhs in order to











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top