SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 324

P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S.N.DWIVEDI
Hindustan Lever – Appellant
Versus
Workmen – Respondent


Judgment

DWIVEDI, J.:- The appellant is the Hindustan Lever Ltd. Ghaziabad. One P. P. Jude was employed as Incharge of the Animal Feeding Stuff Department in the factory at Ghaziabad. On April 10, 1967 he was transferred as In-charge to the Engineering Store Section. There are four grades of technical employees in the factory. The grades are called as Grade T 1, Grade T 2. Grade T 3, and Grade T 4. When P. P. Jude was working as In-charge of the Animal Feeding Stuff Department, he was in Grade T. 3. He was claiming to be placed in Grade T 4, a higher grade. So there were tow disputes in regard to his employment: (1) about his transfer from the Animal Feeding Stuff Department to the Engineering Store Section; and (2) about his being given Grade T 4. These disputes were referred by the State Government for adjudication to Labour Court, Meerut, on December 30, 1967.

2. Labour Court framed five issues. One of them is: Whether P. P. Jude was not placed in Grade T-4 because of his trade union activities? It is not necessary to mention the other issues. Labour Court found that there was no evidence to show that he was victimized for his trade union activities. On merits. Labour Court seems








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top