SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 316

K.K.MATHEW, M.H.BEG, A.K.MUKHERJEE
State of Mysore – Appellant
Versus
H. D. Kolkar – Respondent


Advocates:
N.R.CHAUDHARY, R.B.DATAR, S.V.Gupta, V.MAYA KRISHNAN

Judgment

MATHEW, J.:- The respondent in this appeal started service as a police constable in the State of Bombay in 1935. He became a head constable 20 after he was allotted to the State of Mysore consequent on the reorganization of the State. In the year 1962, disciplinary proceedings were commenced against him. The charge was that he was found missing from his post between 11.30 P. M. on March 21, 1962 and 3.30 P.M. on the next day. The Superintendent of Police found him guilty of the charge and demoted him as a police constable.

2. The respondent preferred an appeal to the Deputy Inspector General of Police but that was dismissed. The respondent then filed a revision before the State Government under Rule 17 of the Bombay Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1956, hereinafter called the "Rules", The Government thereafter issued a show cause notice to the respondent stating why the punishment imposed upon him by the Superintendent of Police should not be enhanced. After hearing the respondent, the punishment was enhanced to one of dismissal by the Government.

3. The respondent filed a writ petition before the High Court of Mysore to quash the order. He raised two grounds in the wri






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top