SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 391

M.H.BEG, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Ram Pukar Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

CHANDRACHUD, J. :- This appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment of the High Court at Patna confirming the conviction of appellant 1 under Section 302, Penal Code, that of appellants 2 to 8 under Section 302 read with Section 149 and the sentence of life imprisonment imposed on each of them. Appellant 6 has also been convicted under S. 323 but no separate sentence has been passed for that offence.

2. At about 1 a.m. on the night between 12th and 13th May, 1966, an eighteen-year old boy, Arjun, was done to death. He was sleeping in the courtyard of his house and he and his brother Nakuldeo Thakur (P. W. 1) were occupying the same cot. Nakuldeo noticed that certain persons were standing near the cot and one of them gave a lead to the others to beat. Nakuldeo escaped with his torch and before he had run a few paces he heard Arjun saying "Ram Pukar Kaka, do not kill me . Ram Pukar is appellant 1 before us. It is alleged that thereafter Ram Pukar attacked Arjun with a spear and some of the other appellants attacked Nakuldeo himself with lathis.

3. Apart from Nakuldeo, two other brothers of the deceased Arjun, Rajendar (P.W. 6) and Dwapar (P.W. 7) also claimed to hav








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top