SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 374

K.K.MATHEW, M.H.BEG
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Sughar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

MATHEW, J. :- This appeal, by certificate is directed against the judgment and decree dated September 8, 1970 of the Allahabad High Court. The short facts of the case are as follows. The respondent Sughar Singh was a permanent head constable in the U. P. Police Force between 1950 and 1960. Sometime in 1960, he was deputed for training as a credit Sub-Inspector at the Armed Police Training Centre at Sitapur. On March 16, 1961, Sughar Singh was appointed an officiating Platoon Commander. He worked in that post till August, 1968. While working as a Platoon Commander, on July 22, 1966, the respondent was served with anotice by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Kanpur, in which he was asked to show cause within 10 days of the receipt of that notice as to why the following adverse entry should not be entered in his character roll:

"1966 - Is suspected to have got entries of date of birth and educational qualifications altered on the authority of a fictitious certificate which had to be corrected later on Severely warned."

The respondent submitted an explanation in accordance with the terms of this notice on July 30, 1966. The explanation was not, however, found acceptable and an




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top