SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 126

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, I.D.DUA
Hind Cycles LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Workmen – Respondent


Judgment

VAIDIALINGAM, J.:-In this appeal, by special leave, Mr. G. B. Pal learned counsel for the appellant, challenges the award dated the 26th April, 1968, of the Industrial Tribunal, Maharashtra, Bombay, in Reference (IT) No. 258 of 1964 granting interim relief to workmen according to the recommendations of the Central Wage Board for Engineering Industries. The main Reference itself takes in several matters, such as fixation of wage scales, classification, dearness allowance, production bonus. gratuity etc.

2. The Steel Mazdoor Sabha, representing the workmen filed an application for grant of interim relief on the ground that the proceedings before the Tribunal are not likely to come to an end at an early date. In fact, the application was filed for the grant of interim relief, based on the recommendations for payment of interim relief, made by the Central Wage Board for the Engineering Industries on February 12, 1966 and accepted by the Central Government on July 23, 1966. The claim on behalf of the workmen was that they must be paid interim relief at the rate of : (a) Rs. 6/- per month in respect of workmen earning wages above Rs. 150/- but not more than Rs. 250/- per month, an













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top