SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(SC) 30

P.K.GOSWAMI, P.N.BHAGWATI
Harbans Lal Jain – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
J.B.DADACHAN, L.M.SINGHVI, P.C.BHARTARI, R.N.SACH, Ravindra Narayan, S.N.PRASAD

Judgment

GOSWAMI, J. :- These two counter appeals by certificates are directed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court in a land acquisition case. The facts appearing from the judgment are as follows :

Harbans Lal Jain, the appellant, had purchased an area of land measuring 206 bighas and 11 biswas in village Duripur sometime in 1950. This land had a frontage on the Princess Raod off Kingsway and was behind the Model Town colony. In 1951-52 the appellant sold certain plots out of this land without getting any plans sanctioned by the appropriate authorities. On October 3, 1959 a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (briefly the Act) was made by the Government which ultimately culminated in the acquisition of 43 bighas 4 biswas out of this land. The Land Acquisition Collector (briefly the Collector) awarded compensation at the rate of Re. 1/- per square yard which was increased to Rs. 2/8/- per square yard by the Additional District Judge in the relevant reference case. The High Court of Punjab in appeal further increased the compensation to Rs. 8/- per square yeard by its judgment dated July 24, 1963. There was no further appeal to this Court against that









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top