SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 372

M.H.BEG, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Babuli Alias Narayan Bahera – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent


Judgment

CHANDRACHUD, J.:- Eight persons were put up for trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Cuttack, on the charge that at about 8 p.m. on October 17, 1965. They had committed the murder of one Siba Prusty. The appellant and one other accused were charged under Section 302. Penal Code, simpliciter and they were also charged along with others under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code,. Accused No. 6. Ratnakar Prusti, was granted pardon after the evidence of as many as 31 witnesses was recorded and he was examined as an approver. The learned Judge acquitted all of the accused and in an appeal filed by the State of Orissa that order was confirmed by the High Court of Orissa except in regard to the appellant who has been convicted under Section 302 of the Penal Code and has been sentenced to imprisonment for life. The appellant challenges the correctness of his conviction in this appeal by special leave.

2. On the evening of October 17, 1965, the deceased Siba Prusty and Ghanshyam Ojha (P. W. 1) were returning to their village from a place called Baitarani Road. They were riding on their bicycles, the deceased being a little ahead of Ghanshyam. When they r












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top