SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(SC) 111

A.N.RAY, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, P.K.GOSWAMI, R.S.SARKARIA, S.N.DWIVEDI
Gammon India: Goverdhan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

RAY, C. J.:- These petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution challenge the validity of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 referred to as the Act and of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Central Rules and Rules of the States of Rajasthan and Maharashtra.

2. The petitioners carry on the business of contractors for construction of roads, buildings, weigh bridges and dams.

3. The Act requires contractors to take out licences. The Act also imposes certain duties and liabilities on the contractors.

4. The Act defines in Section 2 (c) a "contractor" in relation to an establishment to mean a person who undertakes to produce a given result for the establishment, other than a mere supply of goods or Articles of manufacture to such establishment, through contract labour or who supplies contract labour for any work of the establishment and includes a sub-contractor.

5. The other definitions relevant to the meaning of a contractor are establishment, principal employer and workman.

6. "Establishment" as defined in Section 2 (e) of the Act means (i) any office or department of the Government or a local authority, or (ii) any place where any industry, tra




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top