Judgment

KRISHNA IYER, J. :- This appeal, filed by special leave, may be disposed of by a short judgment because after having heard counsel for the appellant, Shri Dau, at some length, we are satisfied that no serious question of law arises and a re-appreciation of the evidence to do which we were invited is not permissible in the absence of manifest injustice or perverse understanding of the materials on record by the courts below.

2. The accused, an Assistant Sub-Inspector attached to Police Station Raman, is charged with an offence under Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. According to the prosecution, one Buta Singh had complained against Hakam Singh and others to the accused on May 24, 1968 since he was then the Station House Officer of P. S. Raman within whose limits the offence is said to have taken place. While the accused recorded the report, he did not arrest the accused although they were available in the village. On the next day, Smt. Dhan Kaur, the mother of Buta Singh, complained to Chand Singh, P. W. 2, the Sarpanch of the village that the police officer was not taking steps to arrest the accused in the case where her son had been attacked. P. W. 2 thereupon went to the accused s house and the latter told him that for getting the accused in the case arrested bribe had to be paid. Promising to see him later or send some one else, P. W. 2 returned to his liquor vending shop. He told P. W. 3, Jwala Singh, and P. W. 4, Santokh Singh, about the demand of the accused for money and requested them to meet the accused and settle the payment at a moderate sum, P. Ws. 3 and 4 proceeded to the accused s place, and although initially he asked for Rs. 150/-, he reduced it to Rs. 100/-. The two mediators, P. Ws. 3 and 4, informed P. W. 2 accordingly. This information was conveyed by P. W. 2 to Buta Singh and his mother. Dhan Kaur, the mother, then gave ten currency notes of Rs. 10/- each to be made over to the accused as speed money in the matter of effecting the arrest. P. W. 2 came back to the liquor shop with the money and told P. Ws. 3 and 4 that it was vicious for the accused to be asking for bribe like this and he should be trapped this time. They decided that P. W. 3, who is a friend of the accused, should meet and take the accused to the village where the arrest was to be effect (Bangi Buldu), and P. W.s 2 and 4 proceeded to Bhatinda in a jeep to meet the Deputy Superintendent of Police, P. W. 9. P. W. 2 related the story to P. W. 9 in a complaint and produced the ten ten-rupee notes intended to be passed on to the accused as bribe. P. W. 9 took the necessary follow-up action. He noted the numbers of the said notes and returned them to P. W. 2 directing him and P. W. 4 to proceed to the village and arrange to hand over the notes to the accused if he demanded bribe. P. W. 9 himself agreed to reach the Rest House, Kot Bhakhtu, and wait there for information about the passing of the money.

3. On the above basis, in the afternoon of May 25, P. W. 3 took a jeep, met the accused and assured him that the money would be paid at the village Bangi Buldu and took him along in the jeep to that village. There were two constables, P. Ws. 5 and 6, also with them. Leaving the accused and the constables at Dharamshala, P. W. 3 went to meet P. W. 2 at the former s residence. He apprised P. W. 2 of the fact that the accused had come to the Dharamshala whereupon the money was made over to P. W. 3 with instructions to give it to the accused if demanded. P. W. 3 left for the Dharamshala with the implicating notes and P. W. 2 and 4 shadowed him at a distance and posted themselves at two places in the vicinity of the Dharamshala to avoid being seen, but to be within reach. P. W. 3 met the accused, signaled to him that he had brought the money and, after the persons present were disposed of, the accused asked the two constables to fetch his meals from P. W. 3 s residence. When the constables back was turned on the accused, he