SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 281

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.R. KHANNA AND A. ALAGIRISWAMI, JJ.
Baidya Nath Mandi, Petitioner
Versus
State of W.B. and others, Respondents.
Writ Petn. No. 839 of 1973, D/- 7-9-1973.

Advocates:
G.S.CHATTERJEE, INDER SEN SAWHNEY

The court has the authority to quash orders for detention under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act if the grounds for detention are found to be similar to a previous case where the order was quashed.

Headnote:

habeas corpus - detention under Maintenance of Internal Security Act - The court quashed the order for detention and directed the petitioner to be set at liberty.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was ordered to be detained under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act. After a previous judgment by the court, the petitioner was released, but a fresh order for detention was made on the same grounds.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the facts of the present case were similar to a previous case where the court quashed the order for detention. Consequently, the court quashed the order for the detention of the petitioner and directed that he be set at liberty.

Issues: Detention under Maintenance of Internal Security Act, similarity to previous case, grounds for detention

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the similarity of the present case to a previous case where the order for detention was quashed. The court found that the grounds for the fresh order of detention were the same as the earlier order, which led to the quashing of the detention order.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the court quashed the order for the detention of the petitioner, directing that he be set at liberty.

Judgment

KHANNA, J.:- This is a petition for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by Baidya Nath Mandi, who has been ordered to be detained under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act.

2. No return in opposition to the petition has been filed, but Mr. Chatterjee on behalf of the respondents has at the hearing admitted the following facts. The original order for the detention of the petitioner under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act was made by the District Magistrate Burdwan on December 22, 1971. The petitioner was thereafter arrested and was kept in detention. While the petitioner was in detention, this Court gave its judgment in the case of Shambhu Nath Sarkar v. State of West Bengal, W. P. No. 266 of 1972, dated 19-4-1973. After the aforesaid decision, the State of West Bengal directed that the petitioner be released. The petitioner was, accordingly, released on April 25, 1973. The same day, according to Mr. Chatterjee, a fresh order for the detention of the petitioner was made by the District Magistrate Burdwan under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act. The grounds on which the fresh order of detention was made on April 25, 1973, were the same upon the basis of which the earlier order for the detention of the petitioner had been made on December 22, 1971.

3. We find that the facts of the present case have a close similarity to those of Chotka Hembram v. State of West Bengal, W. P No. 841 of 1973, D/- 29-8-1973, wherein upon similar facts we quashed the order for the detention of the detenu. Following the aforesaid decision, we quash the order for the detention of the petitioner and direct that he be set at liberty.

Petition allowed.

For Citation : AIR 1974 SC 1155

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top