SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(SC) 208

H.R.KHANNA, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Vasant Laxman More – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

CHANDRACHUD, J.:- The appellant who has many aliases, was charged before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, with offences under Sections 302 and 209 of the Penal Code for committing the murder of one Indira Joshi and then taking a poisonous insecticide in a bid to commit suicide. The trial Court convicted the appellant of both the offences and sentenced him to death for the offence of murder. The High Court having confirmed that judgement, the appellant has filed this appeal by special leave of this Court.

2. The circumstantial evidence in support of the charges for which the appellant has been convicted is of the clearest kind. The deceased Indira, a young widow developed friendship with the appellant after the death of her husband. They lived together for a few months and later the appellant shifted to another room for securing which the deceased pledged her ornaments with a moneylender. Separate residence meant separate interests and the appellant feared that he was being jilted. He resented that the deceased should go to cinema houses in the company of others in preference to him.

3. At about 11 a.m. on May 3, 1971 the deceased went to the appellant s










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top