SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
JAGANMOHAN REDDY
Tarlok Singh and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Punjab, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 217 of 1970.
Gurdial Singh, Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab, Respondent.
Criminal Appeals Nos. 141 of 217 of 1970, D/- 30-7-1973.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302, 149 , 307 , 364 , 201 , 148 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 288 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 33 - Murder Offence - Kidnapping - Theft – Appeal Against Conviction - Whether three Kirpan blows were inflicted on deceased before he was lifted and taken on tractor - Whether they made such statements before police, and even though they said that they did, they were confronted with their previous statements - Whether one or two or all accused picked up injured and put him on tractor – Held, There is also nothing to indicate that a murder or an attempt to murder was common intention of all accused when they came to take Daljit Kaur and as such other accused could not have acted in concert in furtherance of that design - Firing appears to have been sudden and other accused could not have known that Tarlok Singh would fire - If so, there would have been a consternation even among other accused, when this firing took place and in this case Court have sufficient credible evidence that these accused except Avtar Singh did not go away on tractor - In view of these serious defects in prosecution evidence Accused-2, Accused-4 to Accused-8 cannot be held guilty of offences under Ss. 307/149 I. P. C - Nor can conviction of Accused 2, 5 to 8 be sustained under Ss. 364 and 201 I. P. C. and they are, therefore, entitled to an acquittal of those charges - Accused-1, Accused-2, Accused-4 to Accused-8 are, however, guilty along with Tarlok Singh of offence of rioting armed with deadly weapons under S.148 I.P.C - Conviction of Accused 2 and Accused Nos.4 to 8 under S.148 I.P.C. and sentences awarded to each of them by High Court are confirmed - They are, however, acquitted of offences under Ss. 307/149 and 201 I.P.C. and their convictions for these offences are set aside - Accused-4 Avtar Singh A-4, who was owner and driver of tractor in which injured Ajit Singh was taken away is alone guilty of kidnapping and hence his conviction and sentence under S.364 is also confirmed, and conviction and sentence of Accused-2, Accused-5 Accused-8 under said section is set aside - Order accordingly.
Judgment
JAGANMOHAN REDDY J.:- Eight accused were charged by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur, of offiences of murder, attempt to murder, kidnapping, theft etc. in respect of an incident which took place on June 9, 1968 at about 9 P.M. in the village of Sathiali, Tarlok Singh accused-1, Avtar Singh accused-4, Upar Singh accused-5, are brothers,Gurdial Singh accused-6 is their relation, Ajit Singh accused-2, Dilbagh Rai accused-7 and Saudagar Singh accused-8 are said to be drinking friends of the accused. Daljit Kaur accused-3 is the wife of Manjit Pal Singh s/o the village Pradhan Harcharan Singh P.W.9. The prosecution case against the accused is that Daljit Kaur who is married to Manjit Pal Singh did not want to live in the house of her father-in-law and her husband, because according to her the father-in-law had an evil eye on her and she wanted to go away to her sister s place. According to the prosecution, Harcharan Singh who is said to be aged 90 years had three sons, two of them withwhom he did not have good relationship lived separately from him at Amritsar and Batala, while Manjit Pal Singh was living with him. Tarlok Singh accused-1 and his brothers were related to Daljit Kaur and were constant visitors to her house. Harcharan Singh suspected that these three accused had illicit relations with his daughter-in-law and this was not liked by Harcharan Singh. As a consequence relations between the parties were strained. Earlier, on the day of the incident at about 2 P.M. it is alleged that Accused 2, 5 and 7 came to the house of Harcharan Singh in a drunken state and started abusing the servants of Harcharan Singh which was objected to. They also abused Harcharan Singh. While this was going on Labh Singh, Bharat Singh P.W. 6 and Rattan Singh P.W.5 intervened, and the three accused were pushed out or persuaded to go away. On the same day at about 9 P.M. all the seven accused A1, A2, A4 to A8 came back to the village with a tractor and parked it in the Haveli of Dilbagh Rai A-7 which was near the house of Harcharan Singh. Then all of them went to the house of Harcharan Singh. At that time Tarlok Singh A-1 had a licensed double-barrel shot gun, Avtar Singh A-4 had a licensed pistol, Ajit Singh A-2 and Gurdial Singh A-6 were each armed with a Kirpan. The remaining accused had a dang each. On reaching the house of Harcharan Singh, Tarlok Singh A-1 is said to have fired three shots in the air from his gun to frighten the inmates. Immediately thereafter Daljit Kaur A-3 who is alleged to have come out of her room asked the accused to finish Harcharan Singh whereupon he was manhandled and received simple injuries. The accused then demanded valuables from Harcharan Singh and took away a steel box containing gold ornaments weighing about 25 tolas. Daljit Kaur also took out her box containing her belongings and followed the accused who forced Harcharan Singh to proceed before them. All the accused while going to the house of Dilbagh Rai began to hurl abuses on all and sundry. On reaching the tractor, Daljit Kaur got into the tractor and the boxes were placed in it. Avtar Singh A-4 drove the tractor and other accused followed the tractor. As they reached the Chowk near the house of Kartar Singh and Khazan Singh, Ajit Singh deceased, Bhagat Singh PW 6, Karam Singh PW 2, Virsa Singh PW 3, Rattan Singh PW 5 and Bahadur Singh PW 4 who were present at the Chowk asked the accused why they were abusing the villagers in general. On being so questioned the other accused asked Tarlok Singh A-1 why he was waiting and why he was not firing. Immediately thereafter Tarlok Singh fired three shots from his gun. The first shot hit Ajit Singh and he fell down. The other shots hit Virsa Singh PW 3 and Karam Singh PW 2. Immediately the accused picked up the injured Ajit Singh and it is said that Ajit Singh A-2 who was armed with Kirpan gave three Kirpan blows to the injured Ajit Singh. The injured Ajit Singh was then lifted and carried by the accu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.